Senin, 27 Juni 2016

The Comfortable Place is not Close to Every Place

Each people dreams of living on a comfortable place as long as they life. For some people, the comfortable place to stay longer is home. It is not in the office, on the road, in the garden, on the sea, in the sky, etc. It caused when staying at home people can take a rest, do everything that they want to do. This case makes an imagination about the comfortable place is if the home is located close to every place that provides everything people need. As called by the comfortable place is described also as modern place like a five-star hotel. People have been understand that it has the good facilities such as cafe, wifi-area, departement store, gymplace, etc. When people live near that area it would brings some benefits.
However, the modern place would lead people to the different lifestyle culturally. Based on the situation and condition of geographic, the character of people is formed. People who have been living in the area, for example, in a village, they have different behaviour and characteristic. The conclusion is the depiction of comfortable place that is illustrated by modern people and villager is difference. The modern place is believed would give some changes to be better. In the short story entitled Protes by Putu Wijaya is depicted that in a area would be built a modern place. The place that provides good facilities for people to be modern people. However, All of inhabitant in that area does not agree with this plan, making a modern place.

According to Mr. Baron, the place that can be believed a good and modern building is described as comfortable place. Modern building is described convinient place for living. Inhabitant will feel comfort for sleep, stay, and play. However, for some native people, a good place does not describe as a big building because they have different culture to describe the comfortable place for living.

Rabu, 24 Desember 2014

(Final Test) FIVE IMPORTANT PARTS OF LINGUISTICS TO LEARN ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Introduction
Learning a new language might not be all that easy, but there are many benefits for example, learning English language. It is true that English has become a global lingua franca over the past several decades. This fact, however, really should have little effect on your decision to learn a foreign language. The attitude that English alone is enough in fact creates self-imposed limitations. To remain monolingual is to stunt your educational development, to restrict your communication and thinking abilities, and to deny yourself the ability to fully appreciate and understand the world in which you live. Learning another language opens up new opportunities and gives you perspectives that you might never have encountered otherwise.
To become master of English language people should know what linguistics is. Linguistics is an important part of learning foreign languages. Linguistics is the scientific study of language. The word was first used in the middle of the 19th century to emphasize the difference between a newer approach to the study of language that was then developing and the more traditional approach of philology (Lyons, 2013)
Philology is the study of language in written historical sources; it is a combination of literary criticismhistory, and linguistics (Peile, 2008). It is more commonly defined as the study of literary texts and written records, the establishment of their authenticity and their original form, and the determination of their meaning. However, in this topic the writer does not want to discuss about philology but linguistics. Here are five important parts of linguistics such as  phonology, the sound system, morphology, the structure of words, syntax, the combination of words into sentences, semantics, the ways in which sounds and meanings of words, and the pragmatics, the study of how utterances are used in communicative acts.
Body
First, Phonology is the system of speech sounds in a language or the system of sounds itself. It likes phonetics that is study of the speech sounds. In fact, phonetics and phonology cover the field of sentence utterance as the object.
Phonetics is concerned with how sounds are produced; transmitted and perceived (we will only look at the production of sounds). Phonology is concerned with how sounds function in relation to each other in a language. In other words, phonetics is about sounds of language, phonology about sound systems of language. Phonetics is a descriptive tool necessary to the study of the phonological aspects of a language.
Phonetics and phonology are worth studying for several reasons. One is that as all study of language, the study of phonology gives us insight into how the human mind works. Two more reasons are that the study of the phonetics of a foreign language gives us a much better ability both to hear and to correct mistakes that we make, and also to teach pronunciation of the foreign language (in this case English) to others (Forel & Puskás, 2005).
As phonetics and phonology both deal with sounds, and as English spelling and English pronunciation are two very different things, it is important that you keep in mind that we are not interested in letters here, but in sounds. For instance, English has not 5 or 6 but 20 different vowels, even if these vowels are all written by different combinations of 6 different letters, "a, e, i, o, u, y". The orthographic spelling of a word will be given in italics, e.g. please, and the phonetic transcription between square brackets [pli:z]. Thus the word please consists of three consonants, [p,l,z], and one vowel, [i:]. And sounds considered from the phonological point of view are put between slashes. 
Second, Morphology is generally attributed to the German poet, novelist, playwright, and philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), who coined it early in the nineteenth century in a biological context. Its etymology is Greek: morph- means ‘shape, form’, and morphology is the study of form or forms. In biology morphology refers to the study of the form and structure of organisms, and in geology it refers to the study of the configuration and evolution of land forms. In linguistics morphology refers to the mental system involved in word formation or to the branch of linguistics that deals with words, their internal structure, and how they are formed. To illustrate what this means, let us consider the word waithood 'the stage in a young college graduate's life when activities such as marrying and finding a place to live are postponed until a job is found or enough money is saved'.
Third, Syntax is the study of the way in which sentences are constructed from smaller units called constituents; how sentences are related to each other. Syntax normally means context-free syntax because of the almost universal use of context-free grammars as a syntax specification mechanism. Syntax defines what sequences of symbols are valid; syntactic validity is independent of any notion of what the symbols mean. For example, a context-free syntax might say that A:=B+C is syntactically valid, while A:=B+; is not. Context-free grammars are described by productions in BNF (Backus naur Form, or Backus Normal Form, named after John Backus and PeterNaur, major designers of Algol-60). 
Along with sleeping, eating and drinking, talking is one of the most common of human activities. Hardly a day goes by when we don’t talk, if only to ourselves! When we speak, we utter a stream of sounds with a certain meaning, which our interlocutors can process and understand, provided of course they speak the same language. Apart from the spoken medium, language also exists in written form. It then consists of a string of letters which form words, which in turn make up sentences. If you have thought about language, you will have realized that whether it is spoken or written, it has structure, and that it is not a hotchpotch of randomly distributed elements. Instead, the linguistic ingredients that language is made up of are arranged in accordance with a set of rules. This set of rules we call the grammar of a language. Grammar is a vast domain of inquiry and it will be necessary to limit ourselves to a sub domain. In this book we will only be concerned with the part of grammar that concerns itself with the structure of sentences. This is called syntax.
How can we go about describing the structure of sentences? Well, before we can even start, we will need to specify what we mean by ‘sentence’. This is not as straightforward a question as it may seem, and linguists have come up with a variety of definitions. In this book we will say that a sentence is a string of words that begins in a capital letter and ends in a full stop, and is typically used to express a state of affairs in the world. This definition is not unproblematic, but will suffice for present purposes.
Let’s now see what kinds of issues syntax deals with. First of all, one of the principal concerns of syntax is theorderof words. In English we cannot string words into a sentence randomly.
Fourth, Semantics is the study of meaning in language. Another definition said that linguistic semantics is the study of how languages organize and express meanings. This, however, leaves us with a second question: what do we understand by “meaning”? What is that “meaning” that is organized and expressed by languages? In very general terms, speaking consists of communicating information: somebody (the speaker) has something in his/her mind (an idea, a feeling, an intention, what not), and decides to communicate it linguistically. Vocal noises are then emitted that are heard by a second person (the hearer), who “translates” these noises back into ideas, with the result being that this hearer somehow “knows” what the first person had in mind. That “something” that was at first in the speaker’s mind and now is also in the hearer’s mind is what we call meaning. What can it be? The problem is that it can be virtually anything: objects (concrete, abstract or imaginary), events and states (past, present, future or hypothetical), all sort of properties of objects, feelings, emotions, intentions, locations, etc. We can talk about anything we can think of (or perhaps almost). And if we were to arrive at a rough idea of what meaning is, we would nevertheless have another list of questions waiting in line. These are some of them, in no particular order:
·         How exact is the “copy” of the meaning that goes “from” the speaker “into” the hearer? That is, how faithful or precise is linguistic communication?
·         How can the meaning of a given word or expression be defined or measured?
·         Are there different types of meaning?
Fifth, Pragmatics is the study of the aspects of meaning and language use that are dependent on the speaker, the addressee and other features of the context of utterance, such as the following:
·         The effect that the following have on the speaker’s choice of expression and the addressee’s interpretation of an utterance:
ü  Context of utterance
ü  Generally observed principles of communication
ü  The goals of the speaker
·         Programmatic concerns, such as
ü  the treatment of given versus new information, including presupposition
ü  deixis
ü  speech acts, especially illocutionary acts
ü  implicature, and
ü  the relations of meaning or function between portions of discourse(see interpropositional relation) or turns of conversation (see conversation analysis).
Conclusion
Many disciplines of cognitive science are concerned with these questions. Linguistics, which is one of these disciplines, narrows down this question in the following way. The crucial question of linguistics:
HOW ARE FORM AND MEANING SYSTEMATICALLY RELATED IN AN ADEQUATE GRAMMAR OF NATURAL LANGUAGE?
We may distinguish different linguistic fields according to which part of this question they focus on:
phonetics phonology                       morphology syntax semantics pragmatics
|_________________________________________________________|
Sounds                                                                                            meanings
The physical side of linguistic utterances—the articulation and perception of speech sounds (articulatory, acoustic and auditory)—is the domain of phonetics. Phonology is the study of the sound patterns of human language. What are the smallest meaning distinguishing units (=phonemes) in a given language? Morphology: the structure of words and the smallest meaning-bearing units and how they combine into words. Syntax: the formation of sentences, how words are combined to larger units than words, to phrases and sentences. Semantics: Semantics is the study of meaning expressed by elements of a language, characterizable as a symbolic system.

Bibliography

Forel, C. A., & Puskás, G. (2005). Phonetics and Phonology. Oldenburgh: University of Oldenburg.
Lyons, S. J. (2013, Agustus 4). Linguistics. Retrieved Desember 28, 2014, from Encyclopedia Britanica: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/342418/linguistics
Peile, J. (2008). Philology. Harvard: Macmillan.

Senin, 27 Oktober 2014

MID Test Academic Writing (Proposal)

A.    Title

Critique upon Materialism in Saint-Exupery’s The Little Prince

B.     Background of the research

Literature is a social institution, using as its medium language, a social creation. They are conventions and norm which could have arisen only in society. But, furthermore, literature ‘represent’ ‘life’; and ‘life’ is, in large measure, a social reality, even though the natural world and the inner or subjective world of the individual have also been objects of literary ‘imitation’. The poet himself is a member of society, possessed of a specific social status; he receives some degree of social recognition and reward; headdresses an audience, however hypothetical (Wellek & Austin, 1956).
Literary work is a place for expressing ideas; a concept and thoughts with images of experience. Literature presents inner experiences of the author to the reader of literary work (community). Literature is not only social reflection but it also presents the idea of the world and the idea of sociological reality in that time.
Historically, the people produce literary work. They distinguish it into two types. They are classic literature and modern literature. Through literature, the mindset of a person or group of people may be affected. Because literature is part of culture, one element of the culture is system of values.
As the product of literature, novel that is only one of many possible prose narrative forms. It shares with other narratives, like the epic and the romance, two basic characteristics: a story and a story-teller. People are interested in the story like folktale, legend, saga and fable.
The fable written by Antoine De Saint-Exupery was very famous in the world. The novel is published in 1943 with the original language France. Then, it spread in the world and translated into many other languages. The story is very interesting. There are two characters that communicate each other. The little prince often asks something to his friend that is a pilot. He was an accident. His plane was in trouble on the machine. The machine should be fixed, the pilot still try to fix it, Nevertheless The Little Prince ask something related to the some objects in the world.
It is good to grow up and become adults. However, sometimes people become very excessive in becoming an adult and eventually they forget how wonderful seeing and feeling the world if they look from the children point of view. A life becomes too serious, too monotonous, and just controlled the numbers. How do I see the world? The way of looking at that would make us more sensitive around the world.

C.    Research questions

This study will attempt to answer the following questions:
a.       How does critique upon materialism represent in this novel?
b.      What is the concept of materialism depicted in this novel?
c.       How is the statement which reflected materialism society in that era?

D.    Reseach objectives

The purposes of the study based on the formulated problems can briefly be stated as follows:
a.       To explain how does materialism happen in this novel?
b.      To identify how is the materialism and hegemony presented.
c.       To describe how does the writer reform the social order of society through The Fable Story.
d.      To describe materialism that was written in the novel.

E.     Benefits of the research

a.      Theoritical  and Practical Benefits

1.      To be able to apply theories gained during the time of the study and know deeper about structure and meaning of gift giving culture viewed from semiotic approach.
2.      To be able to gain knowledge about characteristic of materialism in The Little Prince by Antoine De Saint-Exupery.
3.      To use as a reference on literary research related to the topic.

F.     Review of Related Literature

a.      Reviews of the Previous Studies

Thierza Alkana Mokoginta conducted her study entitled The significance of Symbolism in Relation with Nostalgia for Childhood in Saint-Exupery’s The Little Prince in 2002. This study deals with semiotic theory. The symbols have different meaning especially for the grown-up. The symbols discussed are related to the meaning of life. Saint-Exupery’s nostalgia for childhood has a role to determine the significance of symbolism in the story (Mokoginta, 2002).
Axelle Chazal conducted her study entitled Readers’ Opinions and Preferences in Two Translations of The Little Prince. Many speakers of English will have come to know Saint-Exupery’s Le Petit Prince through its initial translation into English published in 1943. In 1995, more than fifty years after the first, a new translation of this much-loved childrenís classic was published. The blurb on the dust jacket claims that this is a ìradical new translationî which has managed to capture the ìlightness, the liveliness, the basic simplicity which is the essence of childhoodî. In the preface, the translator, Alan Wakeman, describes the earlier translation as ìponderousî (Chazal, 2003).

b.      Theoretical Reviews

1.         Critique
Critique is a method of disciplined, systematic analysis of a written or oral discourse. Although critique is commonly understood as fault finding and negative judgments, it can also involve merit recognition, and in the philosophical tradition it also means a methodical practice of doubt. The contemporary sense of critique has been largely influenced by the Enlightenment critique of prejudice and authority, which championed the emancipation and autonomy from religious and political authorities (Gasche, 2007).
2.         Materialism
Materialism is the origin or nature of everything, where the origin or the nature of everything is material. Therefore asks the metaphysical Materialism, but its metaphysical is a metaphysical Materialism. Materialism is a term in philosophy ontology that emphasizes the primacy of the material factors upon the spiritual in value theory, metaphysics, Physiology, epistemology, or historical explanation. That is, a belief that in this world there is nothing other than matter in in motion. At the other extreme, materialism is a statement stating that the mind (spirit, consciousness, and spirit) is the material that is being moved (Bertes).
Materialism in philosophy is the view that everything that exists is either composed of matter or depends on matter for its existence. Materialism is generally contrasted with idealism, which holds that ideas are real and stresses the importance of the mind and soul. Materialists have generally believed that the only things that are real are the things that a person can perceive through his senses and that all events in the universe can be explained by scientific law. Basic to materialism is the denial of the existence of a God who directs the universe and of the immortality of the individual soul.
In this research the writer is trying to analyze the novel written by Antoine De Saint-Exupery using materialism theory. From the theory the writer is trying to analyze The Little Prince, especially analyzing on statement and quotation that stated.

G.    Research Desain


H.    Objects of the Research

The object of the study is a novel entitled The Little Prince. It is written down by Antoine De Saint-Exupery in 1971.

I.       Research Instruments

In this study, the data is classified into two types, the primary data and the secondary data. The primary data were the object analyzed namely Saint-Exupery novel, the Little Prince. The data available in this text were in the forms of phrases, sentences and the explicit or implicit utterance found in this novel. The secondary data are taken from books, dictionary, and internet websites which are related to the research.

J.      Data Collection Technique

To obtain the necessary data, the writer read the whole of the novel carefully and repeatedly. Then, the writer could understand and get a deep comprehension. The next method is folding the important pages which consist of the problem that will be analyzed in study. Then, underlining and making a note for the main data that related to the problem which will be analyzed by using some theories, concepts and approach. These Techniques are used to help easier in analyzing later. The main data are taken from the comprehension of narrative, dialogues, and thinking of the author which is stated in The Little Prince.
After collecting the data, the data are analyzed into three steps. The first step is classifying the data based on the important data itself. The next step is interpreting the data whether the data is suitable or not with my analysis. For the last step is analyzing the data based on the theory and concept in theoretical framework and then, the writer evaluates the data. After accomplishing all of steps the writer can compile the conclusion.

K.    References

Bressler, C. E. (1998). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chazal, A. (2003). Readers Opinions and Preferences in Two Translations of The Little Prince. Sydney: Macquarie University.
Gasche, R. (2007). The Honor of Thinking: Critique, Theory, Philosophy. New York: Stanford.
Mokoginta, T. A. (2002). The Significance of Symbolism in Relation with Nostalgia for Childhood in Saint-Exupery's The Little Prince. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Suhar, A. (2009). Filsafat Umum. Jakarta: Gunung Persada Press.

Wellek, R., & Austin, W. (1956). Theory of Literature. New York: Horcourt, Brace & World, Inc.